RADami ready to use

I redid the tree likelihoods as the likelihood for each tree on the full data matrix, and the plot now is a lot more informative. It turns out that using the summed locus likelihoods was, as I was concerned, giving a falsely linear relationship. The conclusion now is the same -- no obvious secondary tree out there in this dataset -- but with different islands of trees each having a separate distribution of likelihood scores:

Tree likelihood based on summed loci
Including only loci that have a minimum of 20 unique trees, overall likelihood range of 4,
and selecting supporting vs. disfavoring loci based on a 2-lnL point threshold.

Tree likelihood based on full data matrix
Including only loci that have a minimum of 20 unique trees, overall likelihood range of 4,
and selecting supporting vs. disfavoring loci based on a 2-lnL point threshold.

RADami now builds and installs fine on Linux and Windows (8.1; I assume no problems on older windows).